kittyfritters wrote:Bill Gaylord wrote:Judging from the photo color, it does appear that you lucked out and got reasonably light and consistent sheets. Gotta love it when that happens. I've run across a number of Guillows kits with top quality die-cut parts, as you mentioned this kit having. The people that complain about Guillows die-cutting haven't seen some of the other vintage die-cut kits.
Definitely part of the reason Guillows stayed in business. I just built two Comet die-cut kits, and they were rough. It would have been easier to scratch build, along with recutting parallel ran wing formers, since the "X" construction is horrible. The only attraction was the plastic parts.
As it turned out, the two sheets that the fuselage side parts were cut from, in this kit, were almost exactly the same weight. The fuselage built true right in my hands. (By the way, when you build this kit it works better if you only glue the tail end together above the elevator slot when gluing in the alignment former and the nose former. Glue it together below the elevator slot after it is trued up.) Proper re-engineering of this kit for laser cutting would necessitate having both the fuselage sides cut from the same sheet of wood. This might be a little tricky with the size of the sheets they use in this kit series. Should be interesting to see how they do with it.
I was recently asked to redraw the parts sheet of a 1962 vintage Comet kit for laser cutting. This was for a club group build. I was given and original kit to work from. The die cutting was so bad that I could not see how anyone could have built the model with those parts. The size of the parts did not match the plans to any reasonable tolerance. I ended up redrawing the parts to match the plans and I have received several complements on the fit of the laser cut parts.
On the other hand, I have built some Comet Super Star kits that were cut when the dies were fresh and with suitable lightening, beginning with leaving that damn tube out, they were very satisfying fliers and with the X-wing construction, very durable.
Good points on the fuse construction. It's very difficult to get a 100% straight fuse, with this type of construction. 98% might not be too difficult, but that last bit of perfection is the killer.
LOL on "leaving that damn tube out". It works well for rc, but not for ff. Even in that case, I had to come up with a temporary sleeve construction method, so I could remove the front part of the tube after fuse assembly, providing area to fit the motor. My main issue with the x-wing is appearance. It doesn't work well for an Albatros DV. The parts in the kit definitely fit the definition of not being able to be built out-of-the-box, including the fit of the plastic parts. It's a beautiful model with a bit of added effort, but I can't imagine what it would look like, if built as-is.
Turned out to be a good looking and great flying model however, using the kit wing section, although recut for parallel formers. I imagine it could be a good ff, with a LOT of lightening.
http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthr ... 387&page=2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGqNdDv ... e=youtu.be