by Bill Gaylord » Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:38 pm
If they do ad more LC kits, I would hope that the designer goes to the effort to verify the parts. They've done a decent job with this, but you can still find a few "misses", where checking parts against a few CAD drawn profile views would ensure accuracy. Obviously they can't verify the entire part profiles with 3-views, but the overall dimensions can be verified. With the FW190, I believe the second to last wing rib should be a bit taller, which I believe was a small inaccuracy transferred over from the die-cut kit. Checking the maximum height of each rib against a profile view would verify the maximum height of each rib. That all said however, as you stated, the Guillow's die-cut kits really aren't bad. I can't remember ever coming across any standout problem. They're better than what I've heard about some Dare LC kits, which were CAD tracings of individual hand drawn parts.
I think the problem with the larger kits is that they sell fairly well I would imagine, but aren't built as much, especially the largest models and the P38. It would make it really nice for us builders to be LC, but I wonder if they would really increase sales much, being LC.