Kit 106 Fokker D.8 Build

Ask other modelers for a little help / knowledge ?

Kit 106 Fokker D.8 Build

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:27 pm

Here are some pictures of the frames of my recently started D.8. Now I'm just waiting for the esaki tissue to come in the mail which will take a few days (which gives me time to do my AP summer homework.. :( )
Image
Image
Image
Image
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby jensheydel » Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:47 am

Looks good, nice clean work keep it going. :D

Jens
jensheydel
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:57 am

Postby ADW 123 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:03 pm

looks like a neat project
ADW 123
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:22 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Sat Aug 13, 2011 4:29 pm

yeah, its been real fun so far 8)
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:53 pm

while I've been waiting for the tissue to come, I had fun cutting out and painting Friedrich, who is to pilot the plane...valiantly chasing the SPAD in front of him (which is currently sitting in my closet waiting to be built)
Image
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby Szyp » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:45 am

Frederich better be careful- The SPAD's were noted for the tendency for the wings to stay attached during dives, while the triplane was noted for the opposite. The Fokker was very maneuverable, while the SPAD was quicker, I believe. The lessons learned from WW1 aircraft- maneuverability is nice, but speed kills.Sorry for the rant, but I am a retired history teacher and old habits die hard. :wink:
Szyp
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 4:10 pm

Kit 106 Fokker D.8 Completed

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:48 pm

Here some pics of the completed plane that I just finished. Any comments/suggestions are appreciated. Additionally, if anybody wants the plans, I can mail them to you for free, just let me know!!
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
I think the SPAD will come next: :D
Image
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:44 am

thank you Mr. Duckett
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Fokker D8

Postby rayd » Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:24 am

Lookin' good Arlo...say, FYI, there's an early version of this parasol monoplane in a movie, The Blue Max. In the flick, near the end, seems a decorated Lt. Stachel goes up for an exhibition flight, with the general's ok...owing likely to Stachel's indescretions. He is doomed, and it was earlier noted that the monoplane was difficult to control. Wondering how much Hollywood was factored in, I checked eg Wikipedia, and seems early versions of this plane indeed had problems, including difficulty controlling. Seems they eventually got the bugs out and the plane, the D8, was vastly improved. It's design was a plus in getting away from multi wing craft, which though maneuverable, had there own deficiencies.
rayd
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:08 pm

Postby Steve Blanchard » Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:59 am

Arlo,

Beautiful job on the D-8! One question, Are you planning on flying it? If so, you may be facing some stability issues with having no dihedral in the wing. If you do have problems trimming it out you could try warping some wash-out into both wing tips. Good Luck!

Steve
Steve Blanchard
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:08 am

Postby Arlo DiPasquale » Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:36 pm

I do not plan on flying it due to the fact that the nose cowl and wheels are extremely heavy. Additionally, I did not make the cowl removable.
Arlo DiPasquale
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:22 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN


Return to General Building Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 23 guests