David Duckett wrote:I think you'll find that not all modelers sacrifice form for function.
Sorry if that came across as some sort of criticism, that wasn't how it was intended. I merely meant that plastic modellers (in my experience) care only about how it looks, and weight etc. aren't considerations for them. Ultimately realism is their only yardstick, whereas here, with flying models their in-air performance is the major consideration, so dihedral is altered to aid stability, the tissue is left translucent, undercarriage omitted etc.
Believe me, I had no wish to imply that the models shown on here are aesthetically inferior to plastic kits. They are built to different criteria and so have different standards to meet.