by davidchoate » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:06 am
Well the Hawk Experiment was worth the effort, and not only did I learn about Biplane wing attachmeny, but I discovered the Curtis Hawk to be one of the coolest and interesting Planes ever. There were so many variants, and color schemes. I Googles images, and it was like You could see this Plane evolve from a small Radial Engine into a God knows how many cylinder V-? I counted 14 exhaust tubes on either side. I want to know more. Ernst Udet sold His Soul (literally) to the Devil for a pair of them. I still need a different camera, but managed to get a few pics on My neighbors Phone and can post them. I will go into details more tomorrow. I do not know the exact specs, but I highly doubt that the last model needed two wings. It also appears to have a gear drive, and to My delight a 3-blade prop. The Hawk is just a cool looking Plane. I am certainly going to do a larger one at some point. But back to PT-17. If you look at the pic; I figured out that if you can dry fit and mark, individually, each strut or cabane to its place on the lower wing and fuselage, that you can glue enough parts on to make the wings have enough integrity (without changing location) so that It can be put together without constant ly pulling one strut out of place as You go to put another in. And I had real problems with the strength of the strut assy. joints not holding. (I made at least 4 or 5 do overs on the Hawk. ) So I made small holes in the struts with hand drill, and lashed things together, and applied Very thin CA (srface area is strength. Thanx David Lewis). And also I will use them as a part in the wire rigging.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.