Stearman PT-17

Ask other modelers for a little help / knowledge ?

Stearman PT-17

Postby Brenton » Sun Dec 27, 2015 3:18 pm

Hi, I am building a Stearman PT-17, I'm not sure where L-3, L-4 and L-5 go. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks
Brenton
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby davidchoate » Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:33 am

Look on Plan Sheet At step 1. BUILDING FUSELAGE FRAME- The "l" parts are toward the rear appenage . look at the 3d drawing lowest on that page. L5 is the rubber motor peg support, L3 and L4 are structural webbing it appears for the tailwheel and horiz. stab.Wish I could show You, but My soldering iron got a bit close to My phone and the camera is a little blurred. But the plans are clear.
davidchoate
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:41 am
Location: PHiladelphia PA

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby davidchoate » Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:41 am

"L" parts represent "longitudinal frame" parts I think.I kinda think I wet L-3 as it follows the between the top 2 stringers the stab would rest on, and proceed on a slight curve the length of the stab center, and needs a curve. If stringers are not on 1st they will not go on. They are about last.
davidchoate
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:41 am
Location: PHiladelphia PA

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby David Lewis » Thu Dec 31, 2015 4:42 pm

The letter prefix I believe indicates the building sequence. You start with A parts, then the B parts, etc.
David Lewis
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby backyardbalsapilot » Thu Dec 31, 2015 8:31 pm

I never realized that. It makes a strange amount of sense, though.
backyardbalsapilot
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 1:58 pm

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby davidchoate » Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:06 pm

David Lewis; if Youy see this I think Maybe you may move this to sTABILITY THREAD, BUT i AM EXPERIMENTING WITH bIPLANES, AND WONDERED IF THE TOP AND BOTTOM WING OFFSET WAS FOR STRUCTURAL STRENGTH, OR STABILITY?
davidchoate
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:41 am
Location: PHiladelphia PA

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby dirk gently » Mon Jan 04, 2016 6:48 am

If you mean stagger, than it affected structural rigidity in a negative way, but it improves the wing lift, as the wings are not in each other's way, to put it in layman's terms.
dirk gently
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:50 pm
Location: Poznań, Poland

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby David Lewis » Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:27 pm

Positive stagger moves the high pressure area below the top wing away from the low pressure area above the bottom wing.

The Beech Staggerwing was probably arranged to make a convenient place to mount the main gear.
Last edited by David Lewis on Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
David Lewis
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby Chris A. » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:02 pm

I can understand positive stagger, but how does negative standard work? For instance the Beechcraft Stagger Wing.
Chris A.
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:50 am

Re: Stearman PT-17

Postby dirk gently » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:37 am

In the same way. The stagger is negative, so that the top wing does not obscure the view. But what David said above still applies.
dirk gently
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:50 pm
Location: Poznań, Poland


Return to General Building Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

cron