by Bill Gaylord » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:43 pm
I use less and less myself, as efficient design shouldn't call for much of it, and it weighs, along with the glue used. The stuff is not cheap either. At one time I was on a major CF spar/tube kick.
I noticed the initial comment about LE reinforcement, where I would see that as a case in point, where for all the added effort of CF laminating, you can use an amply strong grade of hard balsa and end up at the same point. The last place I used any was for point reinforcement on the 24" Cub landing gear struts. The alternative to equal strength would have been to use 1/32" light ply, which would have been a bit heavier. The balsa strut legs were notched for the CF spar laminate, which reinforced the struts as well as the axle attachment point. Even in that case however, for all the added effort, 1/32" light ply would have been fine, and not much heavier. Since I covered the parts, the ply could have had lightening holes further lightening it, making the point that it really wasn't much benefit for the effort.
Another LE alternative is using wood dowel rod. 1/8" rod isn't terribly heavy, and is strong. There are cases where you want the thicker/deeper LE for a specific shape on the LE. In those cases however, a reasonable grade of balsa should be amply strong.