by heywooood » Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:26 am
Why do I infill as opposed to ‘skinning’ or overlaying my builds with balsa sheeting?
Two reasons. The first is that there is something seriously wrong with me. Has to be. The other is that I have found that sheeting has two problems - the first is that doing so ‘grows the model’ or makes it oversized. In your example it is grown by 1/16” overall ( when you skin a wing l, top and bottom for example, with 1/32” material that wing is now 1/16” thicker than it should be) The second reason I prefer infill is related to sizing also. When I do it I use 3/32” thick balsa and leave the infill pieces ‘proud’ to the bulkheads, formers and ribs, by about 1/64”. This way, when I sand the model smooth I am sanding typically to the tops of those exposed edges - and ending up with a solid 1/16” minimum material thickness all over the model AND closer to the actual dimensions of the prototype aircraft in scale. Overlaying means sanding that 1/32” thick material unevenly in places causing ‘thin spots’ or sand through. In some places you may end up with balsa that is as thin as tissue. I do it this way for durability and the ability to achieve a better finish without concern for distorting the scale dimensions of the model or sanding through the skin. Everyone who builds has options and can do as they choose. I have streamlined the infill process to make it a bit faster and more efficient, getting max yield from the balsa sheets that I can. Having done both methods I have found I prefer infill - but that’s just my preference.
...you made that out of a box of sticks..?
...what is WRONG with you!